SUPPLEMENT |
Role
of NGOs
The role
of Non Government Organizations (NGOs) in our society has become a
controversial issue. In our definition any non-profit voluntary organization
other than a political party is an NGO. They are essential for a properly
functioning democracy because they give voice to political concerns
of the citizens. The Free Media Movement that works to protect media
freedom is a good example of such an NGO.
NGOs
are also established for developmental (e.g. Sarvodaya), educational
(Marga Institute), social (Kandy Club) or religious (YMBA) or cultural
(Sri Lanka-India Cultural Association- Kalyana SLICA). Many NGOs have
multiple-goals. NGOs can vary in size from small Maranadhaara Samithi
(Funeral Aid Societies) to giant organizations such as Sarvodaya.
Nobody
has an accurate count of the number of NGOs that exist in Sri Lanka.
Depending on what is counted the number probably varies between about
4,000 and 50,000.
In the past two decades international NGOs (INGOs) have also become
increasingly prominent. Official donor agencies such as USAID have
increasingly funded INGOs such as Oxfam and CARE to do development
work in developing countries. These INGos have become very prominent
in Sri Lanka following the tsunami when they collected hundreds of
millions of dollars from ordinary people in their home countries to
assist tsunami victims in Asia.
NGOs
have also raised many complex and controversial issues. Accountability
and transparency are two such important inter-connected issues. Some
NGOs are accused of being not accountable and transparent. NGOs in
turn claim that they are “private” organizations that
are accountable to their members, directors, donors, and perhaps beneficiaries
of their assistance. The degree of transparency varies a lot among
NGOs. Some publish their accounts and activities for public scrutiny
bot others do not.
The degree of government control over NGOs is also a matter for debate.
When President R. Premeds was in office he wanted to exercise greater
government control over NGOs. But he failed in his effort. NGOs argue
that the very rationale for their existence is to be free of government
control to allow independent thinking and action for citizens. If
NGOs are brought under rigid government control, they will be no different
to government agencies or so called NGOs that existed in former communist
countries under the control of the governing Communist Party.
The
fact is that NGOs and governments do not always agree. The former
sees government as intrusive and sometimes even as an obstacle to
their work. Governments sometime see NGOs as a challenge to their
authority.
The
conflicts that exist within societies also get reflected in NGOs.
In Sri Lanka some NGOs have become very controversial on account of
their involvement in the peace process. The “unethical conversion”
controversy is another major source of friction that confronts some
NGOs. Some of these contentious issues have led to the establishment
of new NGOs by opposing groups that are essentially designed to counter
each other.
It is idle to believe that we would have NGOs sans controversy. But
such controversy is mainly a reflection of the complex and contradictory
nature of present society.
|