In this edition
of The Kandy News we report on under-expenditure in the Kandy
District administration of the central government and the Kandy
municipal government. The district is reported to have returned
half (Rs32m) of the Rs 64m that it had received from the treasury
for micro development projects in 2006. The KMC apparently had
spent less than 10% of the money that it had allocated for the
maintenance of roads and buildings. These two stories say a
lot about what is our wrong with our governance.
The amounts involved are so tiny both in absolute terms and
relative to the needs of the community one would have expected
the respective administrations to have spent all what they got
and looked for additional funds. But not our elected and appointed
officials.
The reasons are not clear for the failure of the divisional
secretariats to implement the micro development projects. But
it probably reflects gross incompetence, inefficiency and a
callous disregard for public welfare on the part of the officials
and the elected politicians who sit above them.
The explanation of the KMC varies from official to official.
The head of engineering blames municipal policy and failure
of the municipal stores to supply the requisite material for
repair work. He also says that his effort to draw the attention
of his supervisors including the mayor, deputy mayor and the
commissioner failed to elicit any response from these worthies.
The Deputy Mayor holds the engineer responsible and blames “sabotage”
on the part of officials, a standard excuse in this country
when politicians want to pass the buck. The mayor dishes out
his standard response to most such failures, “I am looking
into the matter.”
These two incidents by themselves may be inconsequential. But
an accumulation of such “small” failures in every
branch of government partly explain the failure of governance
in this country. When the Divisional Secretariats fail to implement
the Rs 50,000 micro-development projects the main losers are
poor villagers. When the KMC fails to fix the roads Kandy ratepayers
suffer.
What could be done to fix this malady? At the most general level
there is a need to improve the work culture in state institutions.
Government officials have to be held accountable for their failures.
Second, connected to accountability is
the issue of transparency. Government money is people's money
and they have the right to know how the money is spent. The
public will know only if government activity is transparent.
Suppose the people of Kandy had known, say by June last year,
that the money available for road repairs was not being used
while the people suffered from bad roads there would have been
public pressure on the KMC. In practice this means that citizens,
civil society and the media must have the right to have such
information.
Sri Lanka does not have a “Freedom of Information”
law. The Ranil Wickremasinghe administration of 2002-04 had
a draft bill ready but his government ended before it could
be passed into law. There is no imminent risk of Mahinda Chinthana
enacting such a law. In fact the opposite has happened. Last
year the government issued a circular instructing officials
not to give information to non-governmental organizations. This
is a denial of a basic political right in a democracy where
civil society organizations should have the right to find out
what the government is doing with the money of the people.
Third, there is the question of capacity of government institutions
to get a job of work done. Often it is assumed quite stupidly
- that the government has infinite capacity to take on additional
work. In fact it is the opposite. It often fails to perform
even the essential services that the government alone can do
well.
Merely having an over bloated bureaucracy
or workers on the payroll are not indicators of capacity to
work efficiently. If that were the case the recruitment of over
40,000 new graduates to the government sector in 2004 should
have resulted in a demonstrable improvement in efficiency in
agencies such as divisional secretariats. There is not an ounce
of evidence to believe that such a thing has happened. Capacity
to work efficiently is a function of a variety of factors from
motivation and good management to technical knowledge. The state
system is seriously deficient in all of these. There are two
solutions. One is to make a serous effort to improve capacity.
The other is to give to the private sector tasks that it may
be able to do better.
A Bouquet for Kandy Traffic Planners
Thanks to the new traffic arrangements
Kandy is again an attractive city for the motorists and traveling
public to visit. The traffic authorities who are responsible
for designing and implementing the scheme have to be congratulated.
The long queues of stationary or crawling vehicles along several
of the main approach roads to the city, especially on Peradeniya
Road, William Gopallawa Mawatha, Hantana Road, and Lake Round
are no more. The congestion in the city centre, main bus stands
and market area have considerably eased.
One of the major positive features of the new traffic system
is making Peradeniya Road and Gopallawa Mawatha one-way. Under
the old two-way system with vehicles parked on either side there
was hardly any space for a smooth flow of traffic in the two
opposite directions. This resulted in the slowest moving vehicles
basically determining the speed of traffic each way. Now the
slow-moving traffic can use the left lane and the fast moving
traffic can use the right lane. This is one of the most compelling
reasons to retain the new system.
But there are other advantages as well. The new system has also
largely eliminated the cascading effect of traffic jams. The
Bogambara Stadium junction illustrates my point. In the old
system vehicles including a large number of buses from the Central
Market area, Lake Round (along the road adjoining parapet wall
of the Prison) and from the hospital and Hantana area met at
the Bogambara Stadium junction that in the rush hours invariably
created a severe traffic snarl. The situation was compounded
by buses moving in and out of the bus two bus parks in Bogambara
and by the intermittent closure of the railway gate at the post
office junction. The resulting inter-locking traffic jams invariably
spread in every direction in the neighbourhood. Prohibiting
a right turn at the railway station junction and allowing vehicles
from the direction of Hantana to proceed straight up to the
junction near the prison gate .and then take the connecting
road up to the old fire brigade has eliminated a queue of buses
from the nearby bus stand occupying more than half the space
of the road preventing free movement of other vehicles.
The third major positive innovation is not allowing parking
of vehicles along most of the main roads and in the city centre
that has also greatly contributed to ease the congestion. But
parking has again been permitted in some of the city centre
areas thereby diluting the beneficial effect of the new arrangement.
Fourth, those who are concerned about air pollution in Kandy
town should welcome the new system that reduces the time that
vehicles are stalled emitting carbon dioxide fumes.
The main complaint against the new arrangement appears to come
from those who have to travel along either Peradeniya Road or
Gopallawa Mawatha some extra distance to crossover to the other
road as the case may be. For some there may be an additional
cost in fuel and time. But that may be a false saving because
delays caused by traffic congestion under the old system could
have cost more fuel and time.
The traffic officials should carefully study any genuine drawbacks
of the new system. But we earnestly appeal to them not to give
into pressure from special interests and dilute the new system
that will reduce the net gains that have been made by the Kandy
community at large.
A Grateful Motorist
|